Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752332AbYCIG2Q (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Mar 2008 01:28:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750718AbYCIG2B (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Mar 2008 01:28:01 -0500 Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:54026 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750699AbYCIG2B (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Mar 2008 01:28:01 -0500 Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 22:33:08 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Balaji Rao Cc: Mikael Pettersson , kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mark kobjects as unitialized Message-ID: <20080309063308.GA5297@suse.de> References: <200803062223.18857.balajirrao@gmail.com> <200803062320.50296.balajirrao@gmail.com> <20080306180559.GA14934@suse.de> <200803090337.16253.balajirrao@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200803090337.16253.balajirrao@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3029 Lines: 74 On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 03:37:16AM +0530, Balaji Rao wrote: > On Thursday 06 March 2008 11:35:59 pm Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 11:20:50PM +0530, Balaji Rao wrote: > > > On Thursday 06 March 2008 10:35:14 pm Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > > Where exactly in the code does that happen? kobjects should not be > > > > "reused" as that implies that they are static, and not dynamically > > > > allocated, right? > > > > > > > > Which kobject is this? > > > Yes, its static. Here's the code from virt/kvm_main.c:1269 > > > > > > static struct sys_device kvm_sysdev = { > > > .id = 0, > > > .cls = &kvm_sysdev_class, > > > }; > > > > > > this sys_device is being registered/unregistered when kvm-intel is > > > loaded/unloaded. > > > > Ah, ok. I'll add this patch then. > > > > > > Ugh, is this the sys_device stuff? I hate that code... > > > > > > > Yes it is! But, why do you hate it ? > > > > For reasons like this :) > > > > kobjects should not be static. the sysdevice stuff was a hack when it > > was originally created and never touched since the mid 2.5 days. It > > needs to be fixed up a lot, and is on my TODO list, slowly getting > > closer to the top... > Hi, > > This patch does not fix it all! The problem is in fact more involved. I also get these BUG reports when I reload kvm-intel. > > BUG kmalloc-8: Object already free > [ 74.696570] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > [ 74.696596] > [ 74.697310] INFO: Allocated in strndup_user+0x30/0x62 age=587 cpu=2 pid=1439 > [ 74.697845] INFO: Freed in kobject_set_name_vargs+0x29/0x32 age=559 cpu=3 pid=1439 > [ 74.698008] INFO: Slab 0xc16f93a0 used=10 fp=0xf7c9d2d8 flags=0x10000c3 > [ 74.698008] INFO: Object 0xf7c9d1f8 @offset=504 fp=0xf7c9d578 > > This happens because, sysdev_class_register assigns a name to the > kobject, and kfrees the old name if any. The poisoned 'name' object > persists in case of statically allocated kobjects and as its passed to > kfree again when re registered, we get the above warning. > > So, AFAICS the best way to solve this is by fixing the kobject users > (kvm, oprofile etc.) to use dynamic kobjects instead of static ones or > memset the kobject to zero before passing it to sysdev_register. I like the memset idea, how about this patch instead? thanks, greg k-h --- a/drivers/base/sys.c +++ b/drivers/base/sys.c @@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ int sysdev_class_register(struct sysdev_ pr_debug("Registering sysdev class '%s'\n", kobject_name(&cls->kset.kobj)); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cls->drivers); + memset(&cls->kset.kobj, 0x00, sizeof(struct kobject)); cls->kset.kobj.parent = &system_kset->kobj; cls->kset.kobj.ktype = &ktype_sysdev_class; cls->kset.kobj.kset = system_kset; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/