Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755260AbYCJR6Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:58:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752055AbYCJR5y (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:57:54 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:45293 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751882AbYCJR5x (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:57:53 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:57:16 -0400 From: Rik van Riel To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lwoodman@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysrq show-all-cpus Message-ID: <20080310135716.0c99a202@bree.surriel.com> In-Reply-To: <20080310104154.56fd4825.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080310133242.0ab69084@bree.surriel.com> <20080310104154.56fd4825.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.10.4; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 619 Lines: 17 On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:41:54 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > How come the sysrq-handling CPU uses show_regs() and the others use > show_stack()? Do we not set up the get_irq_regs() data for IPIs? I tried it that way, and the other CPUs never printed anything. I guess get_irq_regs() data is not present when in an IPI. -- All rights reversed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/