Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756145AbYCJVcK (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:32:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751566AbYCJVb5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:31:57 -0400 Received: from mail.queued.net ([207.210.101.209]:1808 "EHLO mail.queued.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751482AbYCJVb5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:31:57 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:35:44 -0400 From: Andres Salomon To: Andrew Morton Cc: adaplas@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, info-linux@geode.amd.com, jordan.crouse@amd.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] gxfb: create DC/VP/FP-specific handlers rather than using readl/writel Message-ID: <20080310173544.171183fc@ephemeral> In-Reply-To: <20080310142405.e8b92156.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080308204826.0d399caf@ephemeral> <20080310142405.e8b92156.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.10.0 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1420 Lines: 44 On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:24:05 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 20:48:26 -0500 > Andres Salomon wrote: > > > +#define read_dc(reg) readl(par->dc_regs + (reg)) > > +#define write_dc(reg, val) writel((val), par->dc_regs + (reg)) > > + > > +#define read_vp(reg) readl(par->vid_regs + (reg)) > > +#define write_vp(reg, val) writel((uint32_t) (val), \ > > + par->vid_regs + (reg)) > > + > > +#define read_fp(reg) readl(par->vid_regs + (reg)) > > +#define write_fp(reg, val) writel((uint32_t) (val), \ > > + par->vid_regs + (reg)) > > + > > Not very nice, sorry. They're macros, and macros rather suck. And they > implicitly rely upon the caller having some variable called "par" in scope. > > It would be much nicer to do > > /* > * documentation goes here > */ > static inline u32 read_dc(struct geodefb_par *par, int reg) > { > return readl(par->dc_regs, reg); > } > > no? I can change it if you'd like (although.. sigh.) However, it's a lot of extra passing around of the 'par' without any good reason. Normal I prefer inline functions to macros as well, but I don't see the point here. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/