Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757303AbYCJXil (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:38:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751362AbYCJXid (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:38:33 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:35751 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752164AbYCJXic (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:38:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:37:44 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Andres Salomon , adaplas@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, info-linux@geode.amd.com, jordan.crouse@amd.com, samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org, Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] PM/FB/gxfb: add config option that allows disabling of VT switch during suspend Message-Id: <20080310163744.5f6a04b8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <200803102328.19985.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20080308204927.73afa56c@ephemeral> <20080310145118.adb0cf1e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080310181446.2fb85eea@ephemeral> <200803102328.19985.rjw@sisk.pl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1195 Lines: 26 On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:28:18 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > > > > If so, that means extra #ifdef's sprinkled throughout the code. Note > > > > that most framebuffer drivers won't be supporting this, and those that > > > > do will almost certainly always want vt switching turned off.. > > > > > > > > > > I don't think you need any ifdefs or config options at all, do you? Just > > > add a new module parameter to this driver and some little interface into > > > the PM core which allows the driver to set no_vt_switch? > > > > > > > That's a possibility, but doesn't adding hooks into PM core for two > > drivers (lxfb and gxfb) seems like overkill? I also don't really see > > anyone needing to switch back and forth between VT_SWITCH and > > NO_VT_SWITCH other than to work around possible bugs in the register > > save/restore code.. > > FWIW, I prefer the original .config option idea. Please explain your reasoning? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/