Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 13:36:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 13:36:02 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:46096 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 13:35:49 -0500 Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable To: zippel@linux-m68k.org (Roman Zippel) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 18:46:52 +0000 (GMT) Cc: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com, landley@trommello.org (Rob Landley), rml@tech9.net (Robert Love), alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), nigel@nrg.org, akpm@zip.com.au (Andrew Morton), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3C4023A2.8B89C278@linux-m68k.org> from "Roman Zippel" at Jan 12, 2002 12:53:06 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Hey my DVD player has stalled, lets add sem_with_revolting_priority_trick! > > Why the hell is UP Windows XP3 blowing away my Linux box on DVD playing while > > Linux now runs with the grace and speed of IRIX? > > Because the IRIX implementation sucks, every implementation has to suck? > Somehow I have the suspicion you're trying to discourage everyone from > even trying, because if he'd succeeded you'd loose a big chunk of > potential RTLinux customers. Victor has had the same message for years, as have others like Larry McVoy (in fact if Larry and Victor agree on something its unusual enough to remember). So I can vouch for the fact Victor hasn't changed his tune from before rtlinux was ever any real commercial toy. I think you owe him an apology. Now rtlinux and low latency in the main kernel are two different things. One gives you effectively a small embedded system to program for which talks to Linux. From that you draw extremely reliable behaviour and very bounded delay times. Its small enough you can validate it too RtLinux isn't going to help you one bit when it comes to smooth movie playback because the DVD playback is dependant on the Linux file system layers and a whole pile of other code. Low-latency does this quite nicely, and it takes you to the point where hardware becomes the biggest latency cause for the general case. Pre-empt doesn't buy you anything more. You can spend a millisecond locked in an I/O instruction to an irritating device. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/