Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S287303AbSALStc>; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 13:49:32 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S287307AbSALStW>; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 13:49:22 -0500
Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:57616 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S287303AbSALStG>; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 13:49:06 -0500
Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
To: rml@tech9.net (Robert Love)
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 19:00:36 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: landley@trommello.org (Rob Landley), yodaiken@fsmlabs.com,
        alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), nigel@nrg.org,
        akpm@zip.com.au (Andrew Morton), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <1010815300.2011.16.camel@phantasy> from "Robert Love" at Jan 12, 2002 01:01:39 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E16PTOO-0002tO-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> Right.  Here is what I want for 2.5 as a _general_ step towards a better
> kernel that will yield better performance:

I see absolutely _no_ evidence to support this repeated claim. I'm still
waiting to see any evidence that low latency patches are not sufficient, or
an explanation of who is going to fix all the drivers you break in subtle
ways
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/