Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755192AbYCKJnV (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:43:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752189AbYCKJnK (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:43:10 -0400 Received: from minas.ics.muni.cz ([147.251.4.40]:37613 "EHLO minas.ics.muni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751702AbYCKJnJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:43:09 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:42:36 +0100 From: Lukas Hejtmanek To: "Chatre, Reinette" Cc: ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Recent driver in linux kernel 2.6.25-rc2 Message-ID: <20080311094236.GB4344@ics.muni.cz> References: <20080219153910.GA4303@ics.muni.cz> <20080219224418.GA20926@ics.muni.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-echelon: NSA, CIA, CI5, MI5, FBI, KGB, BIS, Plutonium, Bin Laden, bomb User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-Muni-Spam-TestIP: 217.77.165.56 X-Muni-Envelope-From: xhejtman@anubis.ics.muni.cz X-Muni-Virus-Test: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (minas.ics.muni.cz [147.251.4.35]); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:42:57 +0100 (CET) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 995 Lines: 22 On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 05:35:32PM -0700, Chatre, Reinette wrote: > sorry for the delay - please do submit a bug at bughost.org to enable us > to track this problem. > > The error you get is strange - the reason why the channel could not be > set was because the device is not considered to be ready. Yet, from your > debug log all the required steps appear to have completed successfully. > Could you please add a print to the function > iwl4965-base.c:iwl4965_is_ready to see what the value of priv->status > is? I don't have this problem in 2.6.25-rc3 and rc4. However, it seems that the card does not associate with AP if I set iwcofnig wlan0 essid any. Is this a bug or a feature? The AP does not use key and is visible. -- Luk?? Hejtm?nek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/