Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 14:59:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 14:59:23 -0500 Received: from zero.tech9.net ([209.61.188.187]:44048 "EHLO zero.tech9.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 14:59:16 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -G1, 2.5.2-pre10, 2.4.17 (fwd) From: Robert Love To: timothy.covell@ashavan.org Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Cami , mingo@elte.hu, Mike Kravetz , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel , Anton Blanchard , george anzinger , Davide Libenzi , Rusty Russell In-Reply-To: <200201121630.g0CGU5Sr006966@svr3.applink.net> In-Reply-To: <200201112150.g0BLoESr004177@svr3.applink.net> <1010814327.2018.5.camel@phantasy> <200201121630.g0CGU5Sr006966@svr3.applink.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.0.99+cvs.2001.12.18.08.57 (Preview Release) Date: 12 Jan 2002 15:00:44 -0500 Message-Id: <1010865650.2152.38.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2002-01-12 at 11:26, Timothy Covell wrote: > That's the million dollar question. I was just concerned that if that > were to be implemented in a production kernel, then lots of admins > would be confused. It is in 2.5. Let's agree if it is or is not a problem, and then find a solution. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/