Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753763AbYCKQ5X (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:57:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753355AbYCKQ5M (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:57:12 -0400 Received: from outbound-mail-125.bluehost.com ([67.222.38.25]:56929 "HELO outbound-mail-125.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751480AbYCKQ5K (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:57:10 -0400 From: Jesse Barnes To: linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI PCI slot detection driver Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:56:37 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Kenji Kaneshige , Alex Chiang , Greg KH , Gary Hade , warthog19@eaglescrag.net, kristen.c.accardi@intel.com, rick.jones2@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org References: <20080229002341.GA21420@ldl.fc.hp.com> <47D684D0.6060200@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080311132800.GC21482@parisc-linux.org> In-Reply-To: <20080311132800.GC21482@parisc-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803110956.37619.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> X-Identified-User: {642:box128.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.111.27.49 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1191 Lines: 25 On Tuesday, March 11, 2008 6:28 am Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:10:40PM +0900, Kenji Kaneshige wrote: > > 1) I checked ACPI spec again and again, but I could not find any > > reason to add Fujitsu servers to quirks list. So I'd like you to > > add HP servers to the quirks list. I'll send the following patches > > followed by this e-mail. > > Alex pointed out that IBM interprets the spec the same way that HP does. > Are there any other machines that follow the spec the same way that > Fujitsu does? So Kenji is arguing that _STA should be called before _SUN (iow that the _SUN value is bogus unless _STA indicates that the slot is powered)? That seems harder for the user; often times you want to find a slot even if it's powered down & empty (say to add a new card)... It looks like the current code won't provide a slot name on Fujitsu machines in this case, or am I missing something? Thanks, Jesse -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/