Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 15:37:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 15:36:42 -0500 Received: from as3-1-8.ras.s.bonet.se ([217.215.75.181]:46776 "EHLO garbo.localnet") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 15:36:38 -0500 Message-ID: <3C409E3C.A4968CE@canit.se> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 21:36:12 +0100 From: Kenneth Johansson X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.16 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Robert Love , arjan@fenrus.demon.nl, Rob Landley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > > > PRE-EMPT: > > > We get back and we've missed 300 packets, the serial port sharing > > > the IRQ has dropped our internet connection completely. > > > > We don't preempt while IRQ are disabled. > > I must have missed that in the code. I can see you check __cli() status but > I didn't see anywhere you check disable_irq(). Even if you did it doesnt > help when I mask the irq on the chip rather than using disable_irq() calls. > > Alan But you get interrupted by other interrups then so you have the same problem reagardless of any preemtion patch you hopefully lose the cpu for a much shorter time but still the same problem. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/