Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 15:59:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 15:59:43 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:33546 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 15:59:28 -0500 Message-ID: <3C40A39F.8030703@zytor.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 12:59:11 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Arcangeli CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 1-2-3 GB In-Reply-To: <20020112004528.A159@earthlink.net> <20020112141738.L1482@inspiron.school.suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > actually it is really max virtual memory.. but from the user point of > view, user is supposed to care about the virtual memory he can manage, > not about what the kernel will do with the rest. So if the user wants > 3GB of virtual memory available to each task he will select 3GB. I > really don't mind if you want to change it from the kernel point of > view, but given it's the user who's supposed to compile it, also the > current patch looks good enough to me. > Oh, right... if so he simply has the 05G option mislabelled... it should be 3.5G -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/