Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752127AbYCKX3Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:29:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751123AbYCKX3Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:29:16 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:41898 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750965AbYCKX3P (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:29:15 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:26:53 -0700 From: Greg KH To: stephane eranian Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Richter Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perfmon x86 infra(take 2): add AMD Northbridge PCI Id Message-ID: <20080311232653.GA28114@suse.de> References: <7c86c4470803071305x6b575dxa9f7b0588abfd4b@mail.gmail.com> <7c86c4470803110950p54349250pbe29d4122912a2f6@mail.gmail.com> <20080311171216.GB26410@suse.de> <7c86c4470803111610s4a017835s8998d72e44acad3f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7c86c4470803111610s4a017835s8998d72e44acad3f@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1525 Lines: 40 On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 04:10:41PM -0700, stephane eranian wrote: > Greg, > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 09:50:36AM -0700, stephane eranian wrote: > > > Greg, > > > > > > Ingo suggested I send ou the following patch which adds a PCI ID > > > for AMD Barcelona Northbridge. This is used by the perfmon initialization > > > code on this platform. > > > > > > Please apply to your tree. > > > > We are trying to not add pci ids that are only used in one place within > > the kernel. Why can't the perfomon init code just add this value to > > their code? > > > I thought you would want a central place where all PCI ids are defined. > But if you prefer not, then so be it. I'll put it into the perfmon code. > > > Or make this part of the perfmon patch itself, if you really must have > > it. No need to add it to the kernel if there are no in-tree users, > > right? > > > I am starting to push perfmon patches upstream. So you should expect > patches which *currently* have no in-tree users. You have to start from > somewhere, right? Submit them at the same time, is that a problem? We don't want to be accepting changes for an out-of-tree user that doesn't make it in :) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/