Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 16:19:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 16:19:14 -0500 Received: from ns.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.10]:11012 "HELO heather.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 16:19:00 -0500 Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 22:18:35 +0100 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: andersen@codepoet.org Cc: akpm@zip.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable Message-Id: <20020112221835.0da07442.skraw@ithnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20020112210213.GA31236@codepoet.org> In-Reply-To: <1010781207.819.27.camel@phantasy> <20020112121315.B1482@inspiron.school.suse.de> <20020112160714.A10847@planetzork.spacenet> <20020112095209.A5735@hq.fsmlabs.com> <20020112210213.GA31236@codepoet.org> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 12 Jan 2002 14:02:13 -0700 Erik Andersen wrote: > > And guess what? Nobody has tested the damn thing, so it's going > > nowhere. > > I've tested it. I've been running it on my box for the last > several days. Works just great. My box has been quite solid > with it and I've not seen anything to prevent your sending it > to Marcelo for 2.4.18... Sorry for this dumb question: What is the difference to vanilla exactly like in your setup? Better interactive feeling? Throughput? Regards, Stephan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/