Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 18:54:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 18:54:17 -0500 Received: from zero.tech9.net ([209.61.188.187]:63760 "EHLO zero.tech9.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 18:54:06 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -G1, 2.5.2-pre10, 2.4.17 (fwd) From: Robert Love To: Davide Libenzi Cc: timothy.covell@ashavan.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Cami , Ingo Molnar , Mike Kravetz , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel , Anton Blanchard , george anzinger , Rusty Russell In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.0.99+cvs.2001.12.18.08.57 (Preview Release) Date: 12 Jan 2002 18:56:43 -0500 Message-Id: <1010879815.3560.5.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2002-01-12 at 15:44, Davide Libenzi wrote: > My opinion is: if it can be solved with no more than 20 lines of code > let's do it, otherwise let's see what kind of catastrophe will happen by > allowing such behavior. Because i've already seen hundreds of lines of > code added to solve corner cases and removed after 3-4 years because > someone realized that maybe such corner cases does not matter more than a > whit. > I'll be happy to be shut down here ... Completely agreed. I think its an unfair situation (we may see administrators timing the order they start large batch tasks), but it is a corner case and we do have an "optimal cache use" counterargument. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/