Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 14:35:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 14:35:07 -0500 Received: from vger.timpanogas.org ([207.109.151.240]:14604 "EHLO vger.timpanogas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 14:34:53 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 13:01:25 -0700 From: "Jeff V. Merkey" To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" Cc: Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Ben LaHaise Subject: Re: [patch] O_SYNC patch 3/3, add inode dirty buffer list support to ext2 Message-ID: <20001123130125.B23067@vger.timpanogas.org> In-Reply-To: <20001122112646.D6516@redhat.com> <20001122115424.A18592@vger.timpanogas.org> <20001123120135.D8368@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20001123120135.D8368@redhat.com>; from sct@redhat.com on Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 12:01:35PM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 12:01:35PM +0000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 11:54:24AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > > I have not implemented O_SYNC in NWFS, but it looks like I need to add it > > before posting the final patches. This patch appears to force write-through > > of only dirty inodes, and allow reads to continue from cache. Is this > > assumption correct > > Yes: O_SYNC is not required to force reads to be made from disk. > SingleUnix has an "O_RSYNC" option which does that, but O_SYNC and > O_DSYNC don't imply that. Cool. ORACLE is going to **SMOKE** on EXT2 with this change. Jeff > > Cheers, > Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/