Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757383AbYCMVh0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:37:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754077AbYCMVhO (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:37:14 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:55819 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752477AbYCMVhN (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:37:13 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:35:10 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Roland McGrath Cc: paulus@samba.org, anton@samba.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/4] powerpc copy_siginfo_from_user32 Message-Id: <20080313143510.9cfb7ab4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080313083107.8BDE926F992@magilla.localdomain> References: <20080313083107.8BDE926F992@magilla.localdomain> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1517 Lines: 43 Problems. > Subject: [PATCH -mm 1/4] powerpc copy_siginfo_from_user32 This is advertised as a -mm patch but afacit it isn't against -mm. And it doesn't seem to be against mainline either? At least, the fourth patch fails to apply. When trying to apply the fourth patch to -mm I hit a reject due to the new BTS support in git-x86. I stopped there because the patch might be invalid because of this. On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:31:07 -0700 (PDT) Roland McGrath wrote: > > Define the copy_siginfo_from_user32 entry point for powerpc, so > that generic CONFIG_COMPAT code can call it. We already had the > code rolled into compat_sys_rt_sigqueueinfo, this just moves it > out into the canonical function that other arch's define. > Even though this appears to be a signal-related patch it is actually ptrace-related, yes? This patch is a prerequisite for "ptrace: compat_ptrace_request siginfo", but this patch is independent from that patch (and from all others) and hence this patch can be merged on its own into powerpc tree if we wish to go that way, yes? (Although probably it would be better not to do it that way, for sanity's sake). Anwyay, please help me out with the dependencies here, and take a look at the x86 BTS stuff? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/