Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754844AbYCNGft (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:35:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751491AbYCNGfl (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:35:41 -0400 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.171.30]:49208 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751333AbYCNGfk (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:35:40 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:34:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: "Zhang, Yanmin" cc: Andrew Morton , Kay Sievers , Greg Kroah-Hartman , LKML , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: hackbench regression since 2.6.25-rc In-Reply-To: <1205465447.3215.195.camel@ymzhang> Message-ID: References: <1205394417.3215.85.camel@ymzhang> <20080313014808.f8d25c2a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1205400538.3215.148.camel@ymzhang> <1205463842.3215.188.camel@ymzhang> <1205465447.3215.195.camel@ymzhang> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 676 Lines: 16 On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Zhang, Yanmin wrote: > > So block 192 and 512's and very active and their fast free percentage > > is low. > On my 8-core stoakley, there is no such regression. Below data is after testing. Ok get the detailed statistics for this configuration as well. Then we can see what kind of slub behavior changes between both configurations. The 16p is really one node? No strange variances in memory latencies? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/