Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 15:27:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 15:27:48 -0500 Received: from Cantor.suse.de ([194.112.123.193]:23571 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 15:27:35 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 20:57:31 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andi Kleen , Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: {PATCH} isofs stuff Message-ID: <20001123205731.A26914@gruyere.muc.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20001123164436.A17631@gruyere.muc.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from torvalds@transmeta.com on Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 08:59:46AM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 08:59:46AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > [ Btw, I noticed that one of my machines _does_ have gcc-2.95.2, so I can > look at the isofs code generation myself. I don't see anything obvious, > and the code is hairy. The differences between 2.91.66 and 2.95.2 are > big enough that a plain "diff" doesn't show anything clear. Andi, what > does your test-case look like? ] Just a variable width shift of long long with both arguments fetched from deep indirection via pointers, and that all in a function with register pressure (extracted from the XFS source, which does all kinds of nasty things with long long) I am actually not sure if the normal kernel contains even a variable width long long shift. -Andi (who also sees some strange hangs in 2.4.0test11-pre, but more suspects his own hacks. no fs corruption, but I do not run dbench normally) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/