Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756614AbYCNNGZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:06:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755332AbYCNNF6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:05:58 -0400 Received: from mtagate1.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.134]:16910 "EHLO mtagate1.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754598AbYCNNFz (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:05:55 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:05:52 +0100 From: Christof Schmitt To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-btrace@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: blktrace/relay/s390: Oops in subbuf_splice_actor Message-ID: <20080314130552.GA9352@schmichrtp.de.ibm.com> References: <20080314084337.GA9436@schmichrtp.de.ibm.com> <20080314115802.GK17940@kernel.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080314115802.GK17940@kernel.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1691 Lines: 39 On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:58:03PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > That is indeed a bug, does this work for you? > > diff --git a/kernel/relay.c b/kernel/relay.c > index d080b9d..39d1fa8 100644 > --- a/kernel/relay.c > +++ b/kernel/relay.c > @@ -1066,7 +1066,7 @@ static int subbuf_splice_actor(struct file *in, > unsigned int flags, > int *nonpad_ret) > { > - unsigned int pidx, poff, total_len, subbuf_pages, ret; > + unsigned int pidx, poff, total_len, subbuf_pages, nr_pages, ret; > struct rchan_buf *rbuf = in->private_data; > unsigned int subbuf_size = rbuf->chan->subbuf_size; > uint64_t pos = (uint64_t) *ppos; > @@ -1098,7 +1098,9 @@ static int subbuf_splice_actor(struct file *in, > pidx = (read_start / PAGE_SIZE) % subbuf_pages; > poff = read_start & ~PAGE_MASK; > > - for (total_len = 0; spd.nr_pages < subbuf_pages; spd.nr_pages++) { > + nr_pages = min_t(unsigned int, subbuf_pages, PIPE_BUFFERS); > + > + for (total_len = 0; spd.nr_pages < nr_pages; spd.nr_pages++) { > unsigned int this_len, this_end, private; > unsigned int cur_pos = read_start + total_len; With the patch, i can run dd and 'blktrace -h traceserver' without the oops. But the output from blktrace only contains only zeros and no usable data for blkparse. Using blktrace to write the data directly to disk, without using the blktrace server works. Is there anything i should look for to help debugging the problem? Christof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/