Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757749AbYCNVIE (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:08:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754673AbYCNVHv (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:07:51 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:43981 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759258AbYCNVHu (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:07:50 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:06:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: "Zhang, Yanmin" cc: Andrew Morton , Kay Sievers , Greg Kroah-Hartman , LKML , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: hackbench regression since 2.6.25-rc In-Reply-To: <1205479398.3215.284.camel@ymzhang> Message-ID: References: <1205394417.3215.85.camel@ymzhang> <20080313014808.f8d25c2a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1205400538.3215.148.camel@ymzhang> <1205463842.3215.188.camel@ymzhang> <1205465447.3215.195.camel@ymzhang> <1205479398.3215.284.camel@ymzhang> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 603 Lines: 15 On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Zhang, Yanmin wrote: > On my 8-core stoakley, there is no such regression. Below data is after > testing. I was looking for the details on two slab caches. The comparison of the details statistics is likely very interesting because we will be able to see how the doubling of processor counts affects the internal behavior of slub. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/