Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752476AbYCPKnV (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Mar 2008 06:43:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751505AbYCPKnI (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Mar 2008 06:43:08 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.173]:49303 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751276AbYCPKnH (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Mar 2008 06:43:07 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=ojtAlzw0tT07aTinw4MSkGJeil3RY3H9/K3RF6oIYPFeEj4ePWIqnN0TEUGS2SftPFr6o65F6Lrk92kvihpJ4bFau9nlt8LwYuZfAR1bZ+OChSe2nTB4p789fXWaU1I6ZvY3aHYbWTdtFN1VwahhsW+tSbe41U/hNDQUw0S/SH4= Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 11:42:11 +0100 From: Marcin Slusarz To: Allan Menezes Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: HPL benchmarking linux kernel for shared memory performance. Message-ID: <20080316104157.GA6220@joi> References: <47DCB26B.20907@sympatico.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47DCB26B.20907@sympatico.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1600 Lines: 34 On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 01:38:51AM -0400, Allan Menezes wrote: > Hi, > I eliminated in which kernel verion this begins to happen. I am > benchmarking a single node with hpl and openmpi beta 1.3 and gotoblas v1.24 > for personal noncommercial reasons. > I tried a single node with the command $ mpirun -np 1 ./xhpl > and with kernel ver 2.6.23.14 i get over 38Gflops > but with kernel ver 2.6.23.15 compiling with the same .config i get 7.xx > Gflops which is 1/5th that of the other kernel. > Keep in mind that only the kernels have changed from kernel.org not any > hardware or anything else as all else is same! but the performace drops to > 1/5th > There is no network involved in this single node quad core intel test but > just shared memory. > So the shared memory or smp performance of the newer kernels is far far > worse than upto 2.6.23.14! > Even with 2.6.25.rc5 the performance is degraded! > Can you please help me find why this is occurring? Please advise! > mY set up Quad core Q6600 intel overclocked stably to 2.88 GHZ , 6 gig ddr2 > 800 mhz dual channel ram, > Allan Menezes If you want to speed up bug resolution, you can bisect it to only one patch with git (google for git bisect) on this tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.23.y.git ps: please post your .config and dmesg output Marcin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/