Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752810AbYCPOar (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Mar 2008 10:30:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751926AbYCPOah (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Mar 2008 10:30:37 -0400 Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]:59640 "EHLO ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751918AbYCPOah (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Mar 2008 10:30:37 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 04/02/2003 (gentoo 2.7.2) with nmh-1.2 To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz cc: Anders Eriksson , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linus Torvalds , Jens Axboe , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc4 In-reply-to: <200803161529.48527.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <200803101504.17219.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20080316140118.891732DC044@tippex.mynet.homeunix.org> <200803161529.48527.bzolnier@gmail.com> Comments: In-reply-to Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz message dated "Sun, 16 Mar 2008 15:29:47 +0100." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 15:29:00 +0100 From: Anders Eriksson Message-Id: <20080316142901.015342DC044@tippex.mynet.homeunix.org> X-Originating-IP: 83.252.237.4 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1Jatrp-00075h-4Z. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1Jatrp-00075h-4Z 5fc72bf455d36f8744fe4fdddf46756d Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1112 Lines: 30 bzolnier@gmail.com said: > This commit is also _after_ the previously "guilty" one (commit > 852738f39258deafb3d89c187cb1a4050820d555)? Yep. > IIRC we've agreed that bisection between 2.6.24 and commit 8527* was needed? I did that first, and it pointed to 8527* as the bad one. During this bisect I took care to always start from a 2.6.24 .config, and do a make oldconfig from that. A clean series of good emerged.. Unfortunately I don't have the configs from the previous runs saved. Given this, I concluded that the configs had to play a role in making a version go bad, so I decided to do another one between 8527* and 2.6.25-rc1 always based on the 8527* config (which _worked_ when tested with the 2.6.24 config dragged forward. So the upped end of the first bisect was badly chosen) The attahed was the result of that latter run... > Thanks, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/