Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S288021AbSAMTV7>; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 14:21:59 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S288027AbSAMTVt>; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 14:21:49 -0500
Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:44553 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S288021AbSAMTVl>; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 14:21:41 -0500
Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
To: rml@tech9.net (Robert Love)
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 19:32:18 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: jogi@planetzork.ping.de, akpm@zip.com.au (Andrew Morton),
        ed.sweetman@wmich.edu (Ed Sweetman), andrea@suse.de (Andrea Arcangeli),
        yodaiken@fsmlabs.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox),
        nigel@nrg.org, landley@trommello.org (Rob Landley),
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <1010946178.11848.14.camel@phantasy> from "Robert Love" at Jan 13, 2002 01:22:57 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E16PqMc-0007ks-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> Again, preempt seems to reign supreme.  Where is all the information
> correlating preempt is inferior?  To be fair, however, we should bench a
> mini-ll+s test.

How about some actual latency numbers ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/