Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754730AbYCPWiW (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:38:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752730AbYCPWiP (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:38:15 -0400 Received: from phunq.net ([64.81.85.152]:41595 "EHLO moonbase.phunq.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752663AbYCPWiO (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:38:14 -0400 From: Daniel Phillips To: Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:38:05 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: David Newall , Willy Tarreau , Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200803092346.17556.phillips@phunq.net> <47DCB347.2060706@davidnewall.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803161538.06282.phillips@phunq.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 682 Lines: 17 On Sunday 16 March 2008 15:15, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > David Newall writes: > > Do you mean it should be replicated with a second ramback? That would > > be pretty pointless, since all failure modes would affect both. It's > > not like one ramback will survive a crash when the other doesn't. > > It could, in a bit different location maybe, but it isn't a substitute > for ordered writes. How so? Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/