Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754157AbYCPXTG (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Mar 2008 19:19:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752701AbYCPXSy (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Mar 2008 19:18:54 -0400 Received: from x346.tv-sign.ru ([89.108.83.215]:37297 "EHLO mail.screens.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752476AbYCPXSx (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Mar 2008 19:18:53 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 02:17:51 +0300 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Roland McGrath Cc: Andrew Morton , Davide Libenzi , "Eric W. Biederman" , Ingo Molnar , Laurent Riffard , Pavel Emelyanov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ptrace: it is fun to strace /sbin/init Message-ID: <20080316231751.GB379@tv-sign.ru> References: <20080316155455.GA20848@tv-sign.ru> <20080316223138.1029D26F995@magilla.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080316223138.1029D26F995@magilla.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1623 Lines: 43 On 03/16, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > Ptracing of /sbin/init is not allowed. Of course, this is very dangerous, but > > may be useful. Introduce the kernel boot parameter to allow this. > > Personally I wouldn't mind losing all the ptrace/signals special cases for > init. (Just don't have a buggy init and expect not to crash, don't be root > and kill init, etc.) So this is fine by me. The conservative route of > changing it only with a boot option is the wise thing to do. Great. > > Unless I missed something, ptrace_get_task_struct() is pointless. It does not > > need to check "pid == 1", ptrace_attach() does this. It doesn't need tasklist. > > Agreed. It's a hold-over from when there was more hair in there. > > > It should be replaced with the generic find_get_task_by_vpid() which does not > > exist yet. > > I didn't see enough other uses to really warrant it. Most > find_task_by_vpid calls don't actually do get_task_struct. > Those that do want to do some other check inside rcu_read_lock > before deciding to bother with get_task_struct anyway. > So there is nothing wrong with ptrace just open-coding: > > rcu_read_lock(); > child = find_task_by_vpid(pid); > if (child) > get_task_struct(child); > rcu_read_unlock(); proc_task_lookup(), fill_pid(), attach_task_by_pid(), can use the new helper. But yes sure, we can open-code this. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/