Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 15:14:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 15:14:07 -0500 Received: from paloma13.e0k.nbg-hannover.de ([62.181.130.13]:57272 "HELO paloma13.e0k.nbg-hannover.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 15:13:08 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" From: Dieter =?iso-8859-15?q?N=FCtzel?= Organization: DN To: J Sloan , Robert Love Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 21:11:56 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Linux Kernel List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20020113201352Z288089-13997+4417@vger.kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The problem here is that when people report > that the low latency patch works better for them > than the preempt patch, they aren't talking about > bebnchmarking the time to compile a kernel, they > are talking about interactive feel and smoothness. > > You're speaking to a peripheral issue. Yes, but I did latency testing for Robert for several months, now. > I've no agenda other than wanting to see linux > as an attractive option for the multimedia and > gaming crowds I am, too. But more for 3D visualization/simulation (with audio). > - and in my experience, the low > latency patches simply give a much smoother > feel and a more pleasant experience. Not for me. Even when lock-brake is applied. > Kernel > compilation time is the farthest thing from my > mind when e.g. playing Q3A! Q3A is _NOT_ changed in any case. Even some smoother system "feeling" with Q3A and UT 436 running in parallel on an UP 1 GHz Athlon II, 640 MB. Have you seen something on any Win box? > I'd be happy to check out the preempt patch > again and see if anything's changed, if the > problem of tux+preempt oopsing has been > dealt with - You told me that TUX show some problems with preempt before. What problems? Are they TUX specific? Some latency numbers coming soon. -Dieter -- Dieter N?tzel Graduate Student, Computer Science University of Hamburg Department of Computer Science @home: Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/