Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754523AbYCQOjv (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:39:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752854AbYCQOjo (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:39:44 -0400 Received: from mail.lang.hm ([64.81.33.126]:50596 "EHLO bifrost.lang.hm" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752395AbYCQOjn (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:39:43 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 07:42:59 -0700 (PDT) From: david@lang.hm X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: Daniel Phillips cc: David Newall , Alan Cox , Willy Tarreau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet In-Reply-To: <200803170116.19546.phillips@phunq.net> Message-ID: References: <200803092346.17556.phillips@phunq.net> <200803162252.58274.phillips@phunq.net> <200803170116.19546.phillips@phunq.net> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1312 Lines: 30 On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Sunday 16 March 2008 23:49, david@lang.hm wrote: >>> Mirroring on the other hand, makes a realtime copy of a volume, that is >>> never out of date. >> >> so just mirror to a local disk array then. > > Great idea. Except that the disk array has millisecond level latency, > when what we trying to achieve is microsecond level latency. > >> a local disk array has more write bandwidth than a network connection to a >> remote machine, so if you can mirror to a remote machine you can mirror to >> a local disk array. > > So you could potentially connect to a _huge_ disk array and write deltas > to it. The disk array would have to support roughly 3 Gbytes/second of > write bandwidth to keep up with the Violin ramdisk. Doable, but you are > now in the serious heavy iron zone. your network will do less then 1 Gbit/sec, so to mirror in real-time (what you claim is trivial) you would need at least 24 network connections in parallel. that's a LOT harder to setup then a high performance disk array. David Lang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/