Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:00:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:00:47 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:54538 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:00:34 -0500 Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable To: zippel@linux-m68k.org (Roman Zippel) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 21:11:59 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), rml@tech9.net (Robert Love), ken@canit.se (Kenneth Johansson), arjan@fenrus.demon.nl, landley@trommello.org (Rob Landley), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3C41ED4E.4D3F2D2C@linux-m68k.org> from "Roman Zippel" at Jan 13, 2002 09:25:50 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I don't doubt that, but would you seriously consider the ll patch for > inclusion into the main kernel? The mini ll patch definitely. The full ll one needs some head scratching to be sure its correct. pre-empt is a 2.5 thing which in some ways is easier because it doesnt matter if it breaks something. > Please let me rephrase, I just don't expect terrible good latency > numbers with non dma hardware. Expect the same with DMA hardware too at times. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/