Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 17:48:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 17:48:40 -0500 Received: from dsl081-053-223.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.53.223]:52609 "EHLO starship.berlin") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 17:48:37 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Alan Cox , rml@tech9.net (Robert Love) Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 23:50:21 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), landley@trommello.org (Rob Landley), yodaiken@fsmlabs.com, nigel@nrg.org, akpm@zip.com.au (Andrew Morton), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On January 13, 2002 02:41 am, Alan Cox wrote: > [somebody wrote] > > For a solution to latency concerns, I'd much prefer to lay a framework > > down that provides a proper solution and then work on fine tuning the > > kernel to get the desired latency out of it. > > As the low latency patch proves, the framework has always been there, the > ll patches do the rest For that matter, the -preempt patch proves that the framework has always - i.e., since genesis of SMP - been there for a preemptible kernel. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/