Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 17:53:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 17:53:50 -0500 Received: from zero.tech9.net ([209.61.188.187]:30482 "EHLO zero.tech9.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 17:53:41 -0500 Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable From: Robert Love To: Daniel Phillips Cc: jogi@planetzork.ping.de, Andrea Arcangeli , Alan Cox , nigel@nrg.org, Rob Landley , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <20020112121315.B1482@inspiron.school.suse.de> <20020112160714.A10847@planetzork.spacenet> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.1 Date: 13 Jan 2002 17:56:25 -0500 Message-Id: <1010962587.813.22.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2002-01-13 at 17:55, Daniel Phillips wrote: > I'd like to add my 'me too' to those who have requested a re-run of this test, building > the *identical* kernel tree every time, starting from the same initial conditions. > Maybe that's what you did, but it's not clear from your post. He later said he did in fact build the same tree, from the same initial condition, in single user mode, etc etc ... sounded like good testing methodology to me. I later asked for a test of Ingo's sched with ll (to compare to Ingo's sched with preempt). In this test, like the others, preempt gives the best times. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/