Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S288259AbSAMW5t>; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 17:57:49 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S288272AbSAMW5j>; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 17:57:39 -0500
Received: from nat-pool-meridian.redhat.com ([12.107.208.200]:31448 "EHLO
	devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S288260AbSAMW5b>; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 17:57:31 -0500
From: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <200201132257.g0DMvU905716@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.18pre3-ac1
To: vherva@niksula.hut.fi (Ville Herva)
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 17:57:30 -0500 (EST)
Cc: alan@redhat.com (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20020113225244.GC51648@niksula.cs.hut.fi> from "Ville Herva" at Jan 14, 2002 12:52:44 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 04:44:46PM -0500, you [Alan Cox] claimed:
> > People keep bugging me about the -ac tree stuff so this is whats in my
> > current internal diff with the ll patch and the ide changes excluded.
> 
> Any big reason why you aren't including those two? I'm pretty sure a lot of
> people will eventual bug Marcelo (and you) about merging ide to 2.4
> proper (or -ac)... :)

So I can tell which patch causes problems if any

> 2.4.10ac10 (which is what I ran before 17rc1) never showed this. I wan't
> able to reproduce it on purpose.
> 
> I guess this is not the fix for that?

Thats the first I've heard of the other problem
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/