Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 19:14:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 19:14:46 -0500 Received: from hq.fsmlabs.com ([209.155.42.197]:37905 "EHLO hq.fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 19:14:30 -0500 Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 17:11:40 -0700 From: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com To: Robert Love Cc: Daniel Phillips , jogi@planetzork.ping.de, Andrea Arcangeli , Alan Cox , nigel@nrg.org, Rob Landley , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable Message-ID: <20020113171140.B17958@hq.fsmlabs.com> In-Reply-To: <20020112121315.B1482@inspiron.school.suse.de> <20020112160714.A10847@planetzork.spacenet> <1010962587.813.22.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <1010962587.813.22.camel@phantasy>; from rml@tech9.net on Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 05:56:25PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 05:56:25PM -0500, Robert Love wrote: > On Sun, 2002-01-13 at 17:55, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > I'd like to add my 'me too' to those who have requested a re-run of this test, building > > the *identical* kernel tree every time, starting from the same initial conditions. > > Maybe that's what you did, but it's not clear from your post. > > He later said he did in fact build the same tree, from the same initial > condition, in single user mode, etc etc ... sounded like good testing > methodology to me. Really? You think that unpack a tar archive make is a repeatable benchmark? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/