Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 19:45:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 19:44:02 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:13837 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 19:43:01 -0500 Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable To: Robert.Lowery@colorbus.com.au (Robert Lowery) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:51:30 +0000 (GMT) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andrea@suse.de In-Reply-To: <370747DEFD89D2119AFD00C0F017E66156A8AE@cbus613-server4.colorbus.com.au> from "Robert Lowery" at Jan 14, 2002 11:33:18 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Quick question from a kernel newbie. > > Could this audit be partially automated by the Stanford Checker? or would > there be too many false positives from other similar looping code? Some it can probably be audited but much of this stuff depends on knowing the hardware. I've yet to meet a gcc that can read manuals alas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/