Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S938989AbYCSVv2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:51:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754105AbYCSUUI (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:20:08 -0400 Received: from g1t0027.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.34]:48742 "EHLO g1t0027.austin.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932290AbYCSUUF (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:20:05 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:49:13 -0600 From: Alex Chiang To: Kenji Kaneshige Cc: Gary Hade , Kristen Carlson Accardi , Greg KH , Jesse Barnes , Matthew Wilcox , warthog19@eaglescrag.net, rick.jones2@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI PCI slot detection driver Message-ID: <20080318204913.GA18797@ldl.fc.hp.com> Mail-Followup-To: Alex Chiang , Kenji Kaneshige , Gary Hade , Kristen Carlson Accardi , Greg KH , Jesse Barnes , Matthew Wilcox , warthog19@eaglescrag.net, rick.jones2@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org References: <20080304230937.GD3694@ldl.fc.hp.com> <47CDF339.3060304@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080305202052.GN3694@ldl.fc.hp.com> <47D684D0.6060200@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080311110403.7db9527c@appleyard> <20080311191406.GB29344@ldl.fc.hp.com> <47D7BF6C.3080306@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080313032410.GA17561@ldl.fc.hp.com> <20080314021646.GC6145@us.ibm.com> <47DA0E77.9010706@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47DA0E77.9010706@jp.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 965 Lines: 31 Hi Kenji-san, > Ok, I understood what you mean and I agreed both implementations > are legal. Also I explained it to our firmware team, and they > understood your situation. Great, thanks. > I don't know which implementation is more popular. But according > to the current score (2 : 1), you win the "majority rule". Yep, and when we get more testing, if it turns out that more vendors follow the Fujitsu interpretation, then we can change the default behavior. > Alex-san, could you send me the updated patches? I'll Ack the > patch after adding Fujitsu firmware versions to the DMI list > and testing it. Yes, I'll send out a new patch series today that also fixes the shpchp/pciehp naming issue. Thanks. /ac -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/