Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161433AbYCSWDs (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:03:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760033AbYCSU1n (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:27:43 -0400 Received: from netrider.rowland.org ([192.131.102.5]:2177 "HELO netrider.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S933189AbYCSU1m (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:27:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:01:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Alan Stern X-X-Sender: stern@netrider.rowland.org To: "Eric W. Biederman" cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Huang, Ying" , , Kexec Mailing List , , Andrew Morton , , Vivek Goyal , Len Brown Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH -mm] kexec jump -v9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1017 Lines: 26 On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Alan Stern writes: > > Could it be connected with the way the boot kernel hands control over > > to the image kernel? Presumably ACPI isn't prepared to deal with that > > sort of thing during a boot from S5. It would have to be fooled into > > thinking the two kernels were one and the same. > > It should be easy to test if it is a hand over problem, by turning off > the laptop by placing it in S5 (shutdown -h now) and then booting same > kernel again. ? Doesn't this happen every time Rafael turns the computer off and then turns it back on? Do you mean that Rafael should do an S5-type hibernate, but then reboot in such a way that the image isn't loaded and resumed? Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/