Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966566AbYCSWlL (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:41:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764767AbYCSVMN (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:12:13 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:49873 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936502AbYCSVME (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:12:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:11:12 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, morgan@kernel.org, buraphalinuxserver@gmail.com, lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] file capabilities: remove cap_task_kill() (-git) Message-Id: <20080319141112.02981daf.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080319165635.GH5935@sergelap.ibm.com> References: <20080319165635.GH5935@sergelap.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1479 Lines: 34 On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:56:35 -0500 "Serge E. Hallyn" wrote: > (resending once against -git. I had sent against -stable in > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/28/225. Without this patch, > atd is broken at least on some distros.) So this fix is needed in 2.6.24.x? > The original justification for cap_task_kill() was as follows: > > check_kill_permission() does appropriate uid equivalence checks. > However with file capabilities it becomes possible for an > unprivileged user to execute a file with file capabilities > resulting in a more privileged task with the same uid. > > However now that cap_task_kill() always returns 0 (permission > granted) when p->uid==current->uid, the whole hook is worthless, > and only likely to create more subtle problems in the corner cases > where it might still be called but return -EPERM. Those cases > are basically when uids are different but euid/suid is equivalent > as per the check in check_kill_permission(). > > One example of a still-broken application is 'at' for non-root users. This 2.6.25-rc6 patch doesn't apply correctly to 2.6.24. I can't find a *formal* copy of your 2.6.24 patch on stable@kernel.org, so perhaps a resend for -stable is in order. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/