Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966806AbYCSWnj (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:43:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965670AbYCSVOH (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:14:07 -0400 Received: from sovereign.computergmbh.de ([85.214.69.204]:42095 "EHLO sovereign.computergmbh.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965668AbYCSVOG (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:14:06 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:40:53 +0100 (CET) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Jan Kara cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not allow setting of quota limits to too high values In-Reply-To: <20080317131138.GA17307@duck.suse.cz> Message-ID: References: <20080312172255.GB21395@duck.suse.cz> <20080313130355.6a84d0c5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080317131138.GA17307@duck.suse.cz> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LNX 882 2007-12-20) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 650 Lines: 16 On Mar 17 2008 14:11, Jan Kara wrote: >> >> For 2.6.26, I assume? I am not able to determine the seriousness of this >> problem from the changelog nor from the patch itself. > > Not really serious. Nobody complained so far (i.e., for the time quota > exists) and the limits will just wrap when you try to set them over 4TB > now. So the patch can wait... So does quota_v2.c even handle quotas > 4 TB? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/