Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S288623AbSANByb>; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 20:54:31 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S288632AbSANByW>; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 20:54:22 -0500
Received: from zero.tech9.net ([209.61.188.187]:51218 "EHLO zero.tech9.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S288623AbSANByL>;
	Sun, 13 Jan 2002 20:54:11 -0500
Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
        Kenneth Johansson <ken@canit.se>, arjan@fenrus.demon.nl,
        Rob Landley <landley@trommello.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0201132349450.32617-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0201132349450.32617-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.1 
Date: 13 Jan 2002 20:56:52 -0500
Message-Id: <1010973413.814.35.camel@phantasy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 2002-01-13 at 20:50, Rik van Riel wrote:

> > So far I haven't seen any evidence, that preempt introduces any _new_
> > serious problems, so I'd rather like to see to get the best out of
> > both.
> 
> Are you seriously suggesting you haven't read a single
> email in this thread yet ?

No, I think he is suggesting he doesn't consider any of the problems
serious.  A lot of it is just smoke.  What is "bad" wrt 2.5?

	Robert Love


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/