Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 21:38:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 21:38:46 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:17418 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 21:38:37 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:38:21 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Duraid Madina Cc: Subject: Re: Any non-BS VM work queued for 2.5? In-Reply-To: <1010956364.50291.0.camel@simplex.idesign.fl.net.au> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14 Jan 2002, Duraid Madina wrote: > A good spot o' webtrawling has left me with the impression that > Rik Riel is Linux's only hope of ever competing with FreeBSD on large > jobs other than dbench. > > Is this true? Judging by the ease with which AA's hackwork made > it into 2.4, I think we may all be, well, fucked. I take it you're volunteering to do tests of the AA VM and of my -rmap VM patch, pointing out weak points in both VMs? (not necessarily performance bugs ... more situations where one or both of the VMs just "fall apart completely", the stuff that really needs to be fixed) regards, Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/