Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 17:01:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 17:01:43 -0500 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:29413 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 17:01:31 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 16:31:28 -0500 (EST) From: Alexander Viro To: Matti Aarnio cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: {PATCH} isofs stuff In-Reply-To: <20001123225900.E28963@mea-ext.zmailer.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Matti Aarnio wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 12:38:55PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > ... > > In fact, almost all filesystems do this at some point. ext2 does it for > > directories too, for some very similar reasons that isofs does. See > > fs/ext2/dir.c: > > > > blk = (filp->f_pos) >> EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE_BITS(sb); > > > > (and don't ask me about the extraneous parenthesis. I bet some LISP > > programmer felt alone and decided to make it a bit more homey). > > > > Linus > > Propably some programmer has been bitten once too many times with > C's operator precedence rules, which only affect more complicated > expressions -- and thus are used rarely, and not remembered well. Come again? Precedence or not, how in hell could anything be stronger than -> or . on the _right_ side? Field names are atoms, you can't have an expression there... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/