Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755834AbYCUHFc (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:05:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753595AbYCUHFV (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:05:21 -0400 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.171.30]:48939 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753540AbYCUHFU (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:05:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:03:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: Eric Dumazet cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Netdev List Subject: Re: [14/14] vcompound: Avoid vmalloc for ehash_locks In-Reply-To: <47E35D73.6060703@cosmosbay.com> Message-ID: References: <20080321061703.921169367@sgi.com> <20080321061727.491610308@sgi.com> <47E35D73.6060703@cosmosbay.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 485 Lines: 11 On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Eric Dumazet wrote: > But, isnt it defeating the purpose of this *particular* vmalloc() use ? I thought that was controlled by hashdist? I did not see it used here and so I assumed that the RR was not intended here. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/