Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757180AbYCUHb1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:31:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753971AbYCUHbN (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:31:13 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:40679 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753898AbYCUHbL (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:31:11 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:31:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20080321.003123.180348056.davem@davemloft.net> To: clameter@sgi.com Cc: dada1@cosmosbay.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [14/14] vcompound: Avoid vmalloc for ehash_locks From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20080321061727.491610308@sgi.com> <47E35D73.6060703@cosmosbay.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 645 Lines: 16 From: Christoph Lameter Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:03:51 -0700 (PDT) > On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > But, isnt it defeating the purpose of this *particular* vmalloc() use ? > > I thought that was controlled by hashdist? I did not see it used here and > so I assumed that the RR was not intended here. It's intended for all of the major networking hash tables. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/