Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:17:38 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00 of 31] x86: unification and xen updates
Message-ID: <20080321131738.GI27245@elte.hu>
References: <47E17171.9090108@goop.org> <20080319200931.GA24828@elte.hu> <20080319213343.GA2195@elte.hu> <47E18B8E.8080104@goop.org> <20080319220028.GA10480@elte.hu> <47E18C9D.4010007@goop.org> <20080319220431.GA11606@elte.hu> <47E19085.2020308@goop.org> <20080319235212.GA22786@elte.hu> <47E2C7E3.40109@goop.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <47E2C7E3.40109@goop.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 855
Lines: 22


* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:

>> so either figure out the bug by review or try turning your IRQ#0 into 
>> a screaming one for debug purposes. (hint: turning irq#0's trigger 
>> mode from 'edge' to 'level' in mpparse.c or ioapic.c does wonders to 
>> that end ;-)
>
> Hm.  I think the problem was that the patch changed the ordering so 
> that the %ebp fault test was happening with interrupts disabled, 
> meaning that any fault-in would happen with interrupts disabled.
>
> Could you tell me if this revised patch still provokes a problem?

it's looking good so far - queued it up.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/