Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758223AbYCUNwX (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Mar 2008 09:52:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757571AbYCUNwL (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Mar 2008 09:52:11 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:57083 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755985AbYCUNwI (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Mar 2008 09:52:08 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:50:01 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Roland McGrath cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , David Miller , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Richard Henderson , tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] ptrace: arch_ptrace -ENOSYS return In-Reply-To: <20080320081658.0B23826F995@magilla.localdomain> Message-ID: References: <20080319211714.8B14226F995@magilla.localdomain> <20080319212024.EA03126F995@magilla.localdomain> <20080320081658.0B23826F995@magilla.localdomain> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LFD 882 2007-12-20) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1668 Lines: 44 On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Roland McGrath wrote: > > Wouldn't it be nicer to just let "arch_ptrace()" return a flag saying > > whether it handled things or not? > > It would certainly be nicer. I would prefer: > > extern int arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, long request, > long addr, long data, long *retval); > > where it returns an error code or it returns 0 and *retval is the value > or it returns 1 and it didn't do anything. > > So this ugliness seemed like a better bet than waiting for 20 more > arch sign-offs before any of it could go in. You are certainly in a > position to just change the generic signature and make every arch do > the update (or fix your typos if you just tweak them all blind), and > let them grumble. I did not presume to do so. What about adding a CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTRACE2, which is set by the archs which are converted. For those which are not you add a fallback implementation: #ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTRACE2 static int arch_ptrace2(whatever your favourite interface) { ret = arch_ptrace(); return do_ugly_fixups(ret); } #endif That way you introduce the new interface and convert one or two archs initialy without breaking the other 22. At the same time you mark arch_ptrace() deprecated so it will get the attention of the arch maintainers pretty fast. Once all archs are converted we can remove the config flag and the fallback quirk. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/