Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 03:26:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 03:26:11 -0500 Received: from pc1-camc5-0-cust78.cam.cable.ntl.com ([80.4.0.78]:31635 "EHLO amadeus.home.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 03:25:59 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 08:24:45 +0000 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Daniel Phillips Cc: Roman Zippel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable Message-ID: <20020114082444.GA24931@fenrus.demon.nl> In-Reply-To: <3C41A545.A903F24C@linux-m68k.org> <20020113153602.GA19130@fenrus.demon.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 06:03:43AM +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote: > Sorry, that's incorrect. I stated why earlier in this thread and akpm signed > off on it. With preempt you get ASAP (i.e., as soon as the outermost > spinlock is done) process scheduling. With hand-coded scheduling points you > get 'as soon as it happens to hit a scheduling point'. > > That is not the only benefit, just the most obvious one. Big duh. So you get there 1 usec sooner. NOBODY will notice that. NOBODY. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/