Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 04:56:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 04:56:38 -0500 Received: from ns.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.10]:3853 "HELO heather.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 04:56:22 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:49:05 +0100 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: Robert Love Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, zippel@linux-m68k.org, ken@canit.se, arjan@fenrus.demon.nl, landley@trommello.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable Message-Id: <20020114104905.0e389c82.skraw@ithnet.com> In-Reply-To: <1010971032.1528.29.camel@phantasy> In-Reply-To: <1010971032.1528.29.camel@phantasy> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 13 Jan 2002 20:17:11 -0500 Robert Love wrote: > For 2.5, however, I tout preempt as the answer. This does not mean just > preempt. It means a preemptible kernel as a basis for beginning > low-latency works in manners other than explicit scheduling statements. Aha, exactly my thoughts... Regards, Stephan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/