Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S289195AbSANK6D>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 05:58:03 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S289194AbSANK5x>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 05:57:53 -0500
Received: from smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.138]:2056 "EHLO
	smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S289190AbSANK5l>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 05:57:41 -0500
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:55:53 +0100 (CET)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
X-X-Sender: <roman@serv>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>,
        Kenneth Johansson <ken@canit.se>, <arjan@fenrus.demon.nl>,
        Rob Landley <landley@trommello.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0201132349450.32617-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201141154020.28881-100000@serv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Rik van Riel wrote:

> > So far I haven't seen any evidence, that preempt introduces any _new_
> > serious problems, so I'd rather like to see to get the best out of
> > both.
>
> Are you seriously suggesting you haven't read a single
> email in this thread yet ?

Could you please be more explicit?

bye, Roman

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/