Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 06:19:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 06:18:57 -0500 Received: from mail.nmskb.cz ([213.151.92.16]:45768 "EHLO sam.nmskb.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 06:18:42 -0500 Message-ID: <3C42BEA1.6080302@nmskb.cz> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:18:57 +0100 From: Marian Jancar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011226 X-Accept-Language: cs, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable In-Reply-To: <20020112121315.B1482@inspiron.school.suse.de> <20020112160714.A10847@planetzork.spacenet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jan 2002 11:25:31.0253 (UTC) FILETIME=[2CE66250:01C19CEE] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Daniel Phillips wrote: >I'd like to add my 'me too' to those who have requested a re-run of this test, building >the *identical* kernel tree every time, starting from the same initial conditions. >Maybe that's what you did, but it's not clear from your post. > Its obvious its same source code under different kernels. It would have no sense to do othervise and it would require more effort than just boot other image and run same script. Marian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/