Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757246AbYCWEsE (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Mar 2008 00:48:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751288AbYCWErz (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Mar 2008 00:47:55 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.154]:53148 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750951AbYCWEry (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Mar 2008 00:47:54 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=kSagkMzkuz8UfybE1f/8o2DWjTjdSpcGdqIAGR5sd1NSvWYJWN8wkfXH0BJVMG2mAkIBfJjkJuvYbppFYRx7T06Wln4A+ih5SAlIf7rZntAG3+T457/W0gt3sT5GYFTkBX/tIp1bDgclB/xB96Tf2pzsGqN3TW/4sLlWT3uhe4g= Message-ID: <2c0942db0803222147y27954bd6hf4cb0cc98ceda2da@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 21:47:52 -0700 From: "Ray Lee" To: Kai Subject: Re: Serious performance regression in Wine applications and Linux 2.6.24.* Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1206240595.9045.1243810639@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1206240595.9045.1243810639@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 50497d738f5bd5ac Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1377 Lines: 28 On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Kai wrote: > Performance degrades by about 60% when I run Wine under any of the > 2.6.24.* kernels. Attached are the output of lspci -vv and the two > config files of each kernel. > > I upgraded to 2.6.24, back to 2.6.23.(not sure), then tried 2.6.24.1 and > 2.6.24.3 and the issue is present in both; it's severe enough that Wine > apps are virtually unusable for me with this version of the kernel; I'm > having to use 2.6.23 until this somehow is resolved. > > I'd like some help figuring out why this performance regression exists, > and what can be done to mitigate it. As wine has a 'wineserver' running in a separate process, it may be related to scheduler changes. Regardless, if you have the time, please retest using he latest git head (or nightly snapshot), and see if the performance regression is still there, and report back. (There have been a lot of changes between 2.6.24 and current git head that impact the scheduler.) Please ensure that the fair group scheduler is disabled in your tests (just as you have in your 2.6.24 config you attached). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/