Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758260AbYCWHVF (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Mar 2008 03:21:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752948AbYCWHUx (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Mar 2008 03:20:53 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:40897 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752884AbYCWHUx (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Mar 2008 03:20:53 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+5+kNtWci5wkv+hxwIfqMd3UkpGSHf52BHNIRxWV 7oXDsm/eTjpo/D Subject: Re: Scalability requirements for sysv ipc From: Mike Galbraith To: Manfred Spraul Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Nadia Derbey , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <1206256081.3649.13.camel@marge.simson.net> References: <47E382DB.70503@colorfullife.com> <47E3ADE3.4030304@bull.net> <47E3B924.3000304@colorfullife.com> <20080321141339.GB9618@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <47E3DD8C.4000904@colorfullife.com> <1206164608.3659.11.camel@marge.simson.net> <47E4DB06.3020003@colorfullife.com> <1206186832.4545.1.camel@marge.simson.net> <47E51637.8060102@colorfullife.com> <1206214504.4538.8.camel@marge.simson.net> <1206256081.3649.13.camel@marge.simson.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 08:20:50 +0100 Message-Id: <1206256850.4367.7.camel@marge.simson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1608 Lines: 56 On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 08:08 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 20:35 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 15:22 +0100, Manfred Spraul wrote: > > > Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > Total: 4691827 Total: 3942000 > > > > > > > Thanks. Unfortunately the test was buggy, it bound the tasks to the > > > wrong cpu :-( > > > Could you run it again? Actually 1 cpu and 4 cpus are probably enough. > > > > Sure. (ran as before, hopefully no transcription errors) > > Looking at the output over morning java, I noticed that pmsg didn't get > recompiled due to a fat finger, so those numbers are bogus. Corrected > condensed version of output is below, charted data attached. > > (hope evolution doesn't turn this into something other than plain text) Pff, I'd rather have had the bounce. Good thing I attached the damn chart, evolution can't screw that up. > > > > 1 > 2 > 3 > 4 > 2.6.22.18-cfs-v24.1 psem > 4791557 > 9403536 > 13583603 > 18103350 > 2.6.22.18-cfs-v24.1 pmsg > 4906249 > 9171440 > 13264752 > 17774106 > 2.6.24.3 psem > 4009069 > 7578648 > 8044041 > 5134381 > 2.6.24.3 pmsg > 3917588 > 7290206 > 7644794 > 4824967 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/